According to Voltaire, the pursuit of perfection should not derail what is good. Unfortunately when it comes to property taxes, Harrisburg cannot even achieve good enough.
A recent study published in Kiplinger.com reports that Pennsylvania is the worst place to retire based on taxes (click on the image to the right for an enlarged view). According to the report, “You might expect that Pennsylvania, second only to Florida in its percentage of residents 65 and older, would cut seniors some slack. While it does offer a property-tax rebate of up to $500 to some older homeowners, our hypothetical couple's $60,000 income was too high to qualify.” The table above shows the top (most favorable), middle, and bottom (least favorable) 5 states to retire in based on taxes.
This is another example of how our antiquated system of collecting taxes is strangling homeowners, and pitting seniors against parents in the ongoing battle to fund education. Unfortunately our elected officials in Harrisburg have been unable to agree upon an alternative to the current system. After failed attempts at half-measures such as Act 72, Act 1, and the under-consideration HB1600, Harrisburg has shied away from more substantive reform alternatives such as the School Property Tax Elimination Act (HB1275). At the heart of the battle against true property tax reform are the special interest groups who seek to protect their turf despite the fact that many Pennsylvanians will be denied relief.
There was such optimism when the discussion of tax reform began last year. After Act 72 and Act 1 failed, the public thought it had sent a message to its legislators that they wanted change, not a tax shift. And it seemed like many in Harrisburg were listening. Our own state representative Chris King sponsored several local public hearings on the matter, and again the public was able to speak in favor of eliminating school property taxes. As the debate carried on in Harrisburg, the idea appeared to be gaining steam. But despite the best efforts of Bucks County people and our local representatives, the political leaders in Harrisburg couldn't agree on the best reform package. They even considered merging a couple of the different bills but those ideas quickly fell. As the debates concluded, we were no closer to property tax reform than we are now.
All you can do is to keep plugging away. Start by contacting our state representative, Chris King, and encourage him to continue the fight until sweeping reforms are passed by the House. And when that is complete, contact Tommy Tomlinson and demand that the Senate follows suit. Undoubtedly there are many reasons why our elected officials can't come to an agreement on true, meaningful property tax reform, but in the end that is not something we should accept.